American Doctors’ Role in Trump’s Defeat

(Not Choosing Trump Is A Blunder For US Citizens)

Taufiq Muhibbuddin Waly, M.D., Internist

Simply put, the main job of a president is to improve the economic standard of the people. This is even more so for a materialistic country, like the US.

A successful state economy is an increase in the standard of living of its people, without having to raise taxes from its people. If the president or the leader of the country is able to raise the standard of living of its people, without having to raise taxes from the people, even lowering taxes from the people, then the cum laude grade must be given to the president or leader of the country.

The US President, Donald Trump, with only 5 years of his administration has earned a cum laude score. The US economy is improving. The standard of living for the American people has improved. US people’s taxes have decreased, from 35% to 21%. Therefore, it is a strange thing if the US people, do not elect Trump as their president.

It’s hard to argue that, despite the possibility of fraud in the US presidential election, COVID-19, was the reason why Trump was not elected by the US people. Not wearing a mask is considered by the US public to be synonymous with Trump’s not being aware of the dangers of COVID-19. Or the election of Biden, is not because of his great economic programs. But only because he was wearing a mask.

US mainstream medias have also been heavily blowing up the problem. So that, in May 2020, the front page of the New York Times, only contained the names of 100,000 Americans who were deemed dead from COVID-19.

In my opinion, it is very ironic, if a US president, with cum laude scores, can be defeated because he did not wear a mask. If the people of the United States have been smart enough about health problems or COVID-19, this would not happen,.

In my opinion, apart from treating patients, a doctor’s job is to educate the public in health problems. It goes even further, which is educating public in everything. As done by dr. Sun Yat Sen (China), dr. Benjamin Franklin (USA), dr. Che Guevara (Argentina), dr. Jose Rizal (Philippines), dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (Indonesia), and so on.

On the basis of the writing above, it is mandatory for me to study this disease seriously. Is it true that COVID-19 is a deadly contagious disease? Is it true that the ferocity of COVID-19 exceeds SARS or MERS? So because it is so malignant, any disease can be caused by COVID-19 (the great imitator disease / the thousand faces diseases / cytokine storm theory).

A person who is asymptomatic and has only close contact with positive COVID-19 individual, should be incarcerated in his home for 2 weeks. If the person dies in prison without the cause of trauma, and has not had his throat swab examined, his body must be wrapped in plastic bag before being buried. In fact, it is not only wrapped in plastic bag, but all religious rituals for the deceased must be eliminated. Are all these things not silly and incomparable injustice?

I don’t see any significant resistance from US doctors regarding the WHO teaching on COVID -19. Harvard medical school, as the number one medical school in the world, does not show any resistance either. Or in other words, Harvard Medical Faculty agrees with WHO’s teaching about COVID-19. Agree with what is written by the US mainstream media to continuously criticize Trump on this COVID-19 issue.

On the other hand, my investigation of international journals shows that the dangers of COVID -19 are only on the same level as ordinary influenza. Or what Trump did by not wearing a mask and his policy of rejecting the lockdown, is already right. Because the pathogenesis of the disease indicates that COVID -19 is different from SARS or MERS. WHO teaches that the pathogenesis of COVID -19 is identical to SARS or MERS.

The conclusion I came to after analyzing international journals is, the target cells of SARS-CoV-2 are goblet cells in the upper respiratory airway. Meanwhile, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have target cells on pneumocyte cells in the lower respiratory airway which are adjacent to the alveolar cells in the lungs. Thus in SARS or MERS, lung organ damage or finding pneumonia and ARDS is very easy to occur (pathophysiology). However, this is not the case for COVID-19. Pneumonia and ARDS are very difficult to occur. Even less, damage to other internal organs. The presence of cytokine storm and other internal organ damage, was based on a study by injecting the SAS-CoV-2 virus into the bodies of mice. Or SARS_COV-2 directly entered the mice’s blood. In fact, SARS-CoV-2 infection in the human body is through the respiratory tract (droplet infection). So it does not directly enter the human blood circulation. On the basis that the target cells are present in the upper respiratory tract and spread by droplet infection, there is nothing to be afraid of with the new variant of SARS-CoV-2. Unless the new variant changes to something like SARS-CoV-1 or MERS-CoV. On that basis, all the causes of death (COD) that are said to be due to COVID-19 must receive big question mark.

Holding firmly to the anamnesis, physical examination, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of a disease already consist of more than 70% correctness of a diagnosis. X-ray and other laboratory examinations are diagnostic tools to reach the 100% correctnes. Such a mindset is the fundamental difference between an internist in providing therapy when compared to other specialists and other intelligent people (Jesus Christ, Prophet Muhammad, Rasputin, and other healers or shamans).

Furthermore, I learned from international journals that the 10 best vaccines from WHO do not cause a good immune response. Comparing that vaccinated people are actually suffering less COVID-19 than unvaccinated people is very subjective (based on phase 3 clinical trial results).
For example, during the flu season that started since October until now. There are a lot of suspect and probable COVID-19 cases. If they are given the vaccine in October, and then in December they don’t catch the flu, then it is not because of the effectiveness of the vaccine, but because of their own immunity. And saying that people who are not vaccinated are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection, in fact it happens not because they have not been vaccinated, but because they have not been experiencing flu this season yet or their immune system is simply weak. Or the body’s immunity is the basis for whether or not someone can be infected by COVID-19. Or the claim from those vaccines that says to be more than 90% effective is highly subjective indeed. Measuring the effectiveness of vaccines must be carried out objectively. That is measuring the immune response that occurs due to injection of the vaccine. Reports of 10 vaccines recommended by WHO, in phase 2 clinical trials, in my assessment do not meet the ideal vaccine requirements. (COVID-19 RELIGION, SLAPSTICK VACCINE AND HORROR VACCINE, The ideal vaccine is the acquisition of IgG against the Corona virus protein spike by measuring it using standard/ Elisa titer. A titer value of more than 1: 200, the presence of a neutralizing antibody titer by using standard measurement with the titer of more than 1: 200, an increase in cytotoxic T lymphocytes and Natural Killer cells and an immune response that can be shown clinically, namely a body temperature of more than or equal to 38 degrees Celsius. And none of the 10 WHO flagship vaccines meet these requirements.

So that I think of those vaccines as the slapstick vaccines. And the funniest one is Sinovac, then the second funniest is Sinopharm. After all, the funniest vaccines are, the safest, than the less funny ones like the Johnson, Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. It is understandable why the world prefers to make slapstick vaccines, rather than horror vaccines, because it is more likely to cause dangerous side effects or human death. Clowning the world is preferred rather than terrorizing the world. Instead, what the world should do is neither clowning its inhabitant nor terrorizing it, but criticizing my opinion about COVID-19. If indeed COVID-19 is only of the same level as ordinary influenza and there is no cytokine storm happening, then the manufacture and vaccination of COVID-19 is not necessary.

I came across a recent journal, which in my opinion deserves to be discussed in this article (S.F. Lumley, et al. Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers. The New England Journal of Medicine, 23 December 2020).

In the journal it was written that only 2 out of 1,265 people with positive anti-spike IgG, were infected again with COVID-19, within the next 6 months after the detection of the anti-spike IgG (positive anti-spike IgG base line). Did that suggest a vaccine only has a positive anti-spike IgG titer as a sign of a good immune response to SARS-CoV-2?

That research is a weak research. Because it did not check for neutralizing antibodies, cytotoxic T lymphocytes and Natural Killer cells. With only 2 out of 1,265 people who were infected again with SARS-CoV-2 after 6 months of detection of anti-spike IgG, this indicates that these persons’ immunity were very good. Therefore it is believed that in addition to anti-spike IgG these person also had high neutralizing antibodies. Likewise with cytotoxic T lymphocytes and their Natural Killer cells. So it wasn’t just positive anti-spike IgG that caused this occurence.

Research to compare IgA titers in people infected with SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR +), with people who haven’t been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR -) and their correlation for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the next 6 months after the initial measurement of IgA titer (baseline value) in my opinion, is more useful to demonstrate immunity after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Because according to the literature IgA antibody plays a more important role than IgG and IgM, in infections that pass through the upper respiratory tract.

On the basis of the above, the conclusion obtained in the journal states that the high probability that someone who does not have anti-spike IgG (8x more likely to get COVID-19) is not only due to the absence of anti-spike IgG alone. But also in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and Natural Killer cells.

In addition, their lifestyle is likely to have been different. People who have had anti-spike IgG or anti-nucleocapsid or a combination of both, have confirmed the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. So that these people will be more careful in their attitude. For example, wearing a mask, social distancing, and washing their hands many times. Consumption of nutritious food will also be preserved, compared to people who have never been exposed to COVID-19. So, it is not because of the presence of anti-spike IgG + or anti-nucleocapsid IgG + or a combination of both that causes a person to become uninfected by COVID-19. Lifestyle changes may be the reason why it is harder for these people to be re-infected again.

With all that has been written above, the question is, am I the one that is right or the US doctors/Harvard medical faculty that is right when mentioning about this COVID-19 problem?

So, in an an effort to get the highest form of truth and educate the people around the world in the matter of COVID-19, I send this article to the top 10 best medical faculties in the world.

I hope that this writing will add to the culture of courage from doctors around the world to assess / evaluate / criticize or even reject writings found in international journals, the opinion of famous professors (such as Anthony Fauci), the CDC decision, or even the WHO decree. Harvard medical faculty and all medical faculties in the world should have instilled this culture of courage when those doctors candidates were still in the education process.

In the end, I hope that the New York Times can publish this article as an effort to educate the US people on the COVID-19 problem or at least as a comparison of what is taught by WHO currently.

This article is submitted to:

  2. US President, Donald Trump
  3. Brazil President, Jail Borsonaro
  4. Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)
  5. Harvard University, United States.
  6. University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
  7. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  8. Stanford University, United States.
  9. John-Hopskin University, United States.
  10. Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
  11. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) United States.
  12. Yale University, United States.
  13. Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
  14. University of California, San Fransisco.
  15. The New York Times


1. Waly TM. The Death of 100,000 US People and The Horror of COVID-19  (The COVID-19 Pandemic has been Over) [Internet]. 2020. [cited January 1st 2020]. Available from: DHF-REVOLUTIONAFANKELIJKHEID » Blog Archive » Intermezzo: The Death of 100,000 US People and The Horror of COVID-19 (The COVID-19 Pandemic has been Over) (

2. Waly TM. Trump Answers The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) [Internet]. 2020. [cited January 1st 2020]. Available from:  DHF-REVOLUTIONAFANKELIJKHEID » Blog Archive » Artikel 57 – TRUMP ANSWERS THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (NEJM) (

3. Waly TM. CoVID-19: God Punishes The World Or The World Punishes Itself. 2020. [cited January 2nd 2020]. Available from: DHF-REVOLUTIONAFANKELIJKHEID » Blog Archive » Artikel 55 – CoVID-19: GOD PUNISHES THE WORLD, OR THE WORLD PUNISHES ITSELF (A Discussion with International Journals) (

4. Waly TM. COVID-19 Religion, Slapstick Vaccine And Horror Vaccine (Fight Against Colonization by COVID-19). 2020. [cited January 2nd 2020]. Available from: DHF-REVOLUTIONAFANKELIJKHEID » Blog Archive » Artikel 59 – COVID-19 RELIGION, SLAPSTICK VACCINE AND HORROR VACCINE (Fight Against Colonization by COVID-19) (